Fears of a Chinese
conspiracy later died down in the UK but similar concerns have more recently
erupted elsewhere. Earlier this year,
the Australian government blocked Huawei’s
participation in the NBN project to build national superfast broadband infrastructure. The company also faced opposition to its
commercial expansion in India and, just this month, a congressional committee report
urged U.S. companies to steer clear of Huawei (and ZTE
Corp, another Chinese supplier), citing concerns that the Chinese government
could install malicious hardware or software in U.S. telecommunications
networks. The report was covered in
detail by ‘The Economist’, no less, the magazine having run a major survey last August on Huawei
and other Chinese multinationals. The Economist sought to draw a distinction between UK and US approaches to Chinese procurement:
“America has no effective system of supply-chain checks.
In Britain, by contrast, where BT is a big customer, Huawei has established a
unit (run in close co-operation with GCHQ, Britain’s signals-intelligence
agency) with security-cleared personnel, including former employees of GCHQ,
who vet gear from China before it is installed.”
I was still radiating in the warm glow from
this reliable assurance when I saw the headline in last Wednesday’s Guardian:
“Huawei's relationship with BT under investigation by MPs”
No comments:
Post a Comment