“There are clear competitive advantages in the market for
infrastructure provision which accrue to those able to draw on economies of
scale and scope. If unchallenged, these may result in the dominance of a single
provider”.
However, it appears
that BT’s dominance in this process has now been both accepted and enshrined.
According to a report in ISP
Review, the Director of a major media research firm has warned that any UK
cities which win government backing to boost their superfast broadband availability
must pick “safe bet” BT to do the job or risk being left with “networks based on technologies that failed
to keep pace with the wider market or devoid of popular service providers “.
The
related fear expressed by the House of Lords was that government dependence on
BT’s own investment strategy, in particular its choice of FTTC as the principal
superfast technology, could restrict service competition. Again, ISP Review has picked up on this
issue and reports that the same fears are now being voiced more widely:
‘At
present the dominant form of superfast broadband delivery on BT’s national UK
telecoms network is FTTC, which at best only offers a somewhat restrictive form
of virtual unbundling known as VULA. Sadly this doesn’t provide the same level
of price, direct control or flexibility as copper LLU services, which is
technically difficult to achieve on fibre’.
ISP Review goes on to record that ‘the CEO of budget ISP TalkTalk, Dido Harding, has warned a Westminster panel session that
the UK government should “start to worry” about
the lack of competition in the new market for fibre
optic based superfast broadband services…Harding added that she had no idea
whether TalkTalk was paying a good price for superfast broadband from BT.
"I simply
don't know, but there's also no alternative," she said. "Over time,
as we consume more of it, I should know and so should Ofcom."
So far, full marks to BT!
No comments:
Post a Comment