“In a converged
world, communications companies should surely be able to offer TV services as
easily as TV companies can offer broadband…What we have is a situation where
the regulators, Ofcom and the Competition Commission, have declared the UK’s
pay TV market to be broken”.
So, for the
umpteenth time, the article was actually a diatribe against the dominant
position of Sky in the pay-TV market and its relatively lightweight
regulation. If only it was that simple…
The other
article, in the same FT edition, was a rather more contemporary take on the
challenges involved in exploiting convergence.
The article cites the limited success of the telco/content model,
explaining that several such alliances are now being unwound, e.g. Vivendi:
Philippe Capron, Vivendi’s
chief financial officer, says: “The previous structure was not understood by
the market [and so] we needed a change in tack. Vivendi has been a product of
history as much as design. We may not be the best owner for each of our assets”.
The FT piece goes on to look
at some of the explanations offered for the apparent demise of these
traditional TMT mergers:
“Tony Worthington, head of TMT at Standard Chartered,
says the success or otherwise of convergent TMT business models depends on the
market, and whether or not managements have a clear model of synergy delivery.
History has proven, he says, that the ones that have to carry legacy
infrastructure have struggled more as investors have taken a dimmer view on the
pipes and cables compared to the “asset-light” approach of Apple… Corporate
advisers say the problem has been that the infrastructure-heavy elements of
telecoms have struggled to break down the walls into the other sectors partly
because they lack the more nimble mindset found in technology and media”.
None of this bodes well for a
group like BT that could hardly be described as ‘asset-light’. And the nimble mindset? Let’s just say it’s not a traditional
strength.
No comments:
Post a Comment