“The programme to extend superfast
broadband to rural areas has been mismanaged by the Department for Culture,
Media and Sport. The sole provider BT has been placed in a quasi-monopolistic
position which it is exploiting by restricting access to cost and roll-out
information. The consumer is failing to get the benefits of healthy competition
and BT will end up owning assets created from £1.2 billion of public money”
The story did not receive
universal coverage; The Times,
for example, restricted it to a small paragraph on page 4. But the BBC decided to bill it as a major news
item and lined up Ms Hodge against Ed Vaizey for the headline 'Today' interview on Radio 4 with
John Humphrys at 8.10. Hodge duly
launched her rehearsed attacks on BT and government, and the scene was set for
a ritual execution. But the response
strategy by Vaizey (and BT), a nice mixture
of blunt denial and data obfuscation, was perfectly judged to kill the story
stone dead. Humphrys floundered. The DCMS minister was therefore able to rebuff this and
later BBC questioning with his head held high:
“Well, we don’t
agree with the report at all. We think
the broadband programme is fantastic; it’s very good value for money and it’s
going to deliver broadband to millions of people living in rural areas who
wouldn’t otherwise t get it”
Give
that man a coconut.
No comments:
Post a Comment