“95% [superfast
coverage] by 2017 should certainly be achievable and is also desirable…In fact,
with the inclusion of FWA, mobile and satellite in the metrics, the targets can
in some senses said to have already been achieved”
So, notwithstanding some recurring criticism of BT’s
commercial tactics, the UK broadband outlook appears remarkably encouraging -
and showing signs that the government’s drip-feed of subsidies is beginning to
pay off. Enjoy the moment!
It’s
a pity, therefore, that some new
research from the US shows Europe’s
broadband investment is actually falling well behind. Based on detailed CAPEX data compiled by Infonetics, Roslyn Layton of Aalborg University in Copenhagen has compared
recent broadband investment levels in the US with that of the aggregate spend by
the 27 EU states. Her results are summarized below.
|
2011
CAPEX
billions
|
2012
CAPEX
billions
|
YoY
Change
|
2011
Population
millions
|
2011
$/pers
|
2012
Population
millions
|
2012
$/pers
|
US
|
$72.4
|
$77.6
|
7%
|
311.6
|
$232
|
313.9
|
$247
|
EU27
|
$63.4
|
$50.3
|
-21%
|
501.9
|
$126
|
500.0
|
$100
|
As the table shows, Europe’s per capita
investment in 2011 was already little more than half that of the US; worse, the
7% downturn in the EU’s spending last year meant that it was spending only 40
cents on broadband equipment for every dollar invested in the US.
Now, there is clearly a ‘political’
agenda behind this research, and one might question whether the apparently superior
US investment has resulted in such a vibrant broadband market, but it seems
fair to conclude that any “best in Europe” claim by the UK might actually amount
to a rather hollow victory.
No comments:
Post a Comment